US
United States of America v. Iran (Case No. 1:18-cv-02534)
Court Case·AI Enriched
Relationships:2
Events:1
Library:3
Confidence:
42%
Key Facts
Type
Court Case
Sector
Not specified
Industry
Not specified
Status
Draft
Country
United States
Also Known As
U.S. v. IranUSA v. IranUnited States v. Iran
Tags
terrorismstate-sponsored terrorismFSIAinternational lawsanctions enforcementforeign sovereign immunity
Overall Confidence
42%
Internal Notes
No notes
Key Information
Positions
No positions added
Case Number
1:18-cv-02534
Court
Not specified
Jurisdiction
Not specified
Filing Date
Not specified
Case Status
Not specified
Case Type
Civil
Plaintiffs
United States of America
Defendants
Iran
About
A 2018 case brought by the U.S. government against Iran, seeking to hold the Iranian government accountable for supporting terrorism and violating international law.
Key Relationships
David Schenker
testified
David Schenker, as Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, provided expert testimony and official statements in support of U.S. legal actions against Iran, including sanctions enforcement and terrorism-related litigation. His role involved detailing Iran's destabilizing activities in the Levant region, which were used as evidence in this and related cases.
Since 2019
David Schenker
resulted_in
Schenker's tenure as Assistant Secretary of State coincided with the U.S. government's legal efforts to counter Iranian influence, including United States of America v. Iran. Schenker's policy recommendations, particularly his advocacy for sanctions and diplomatic pressure, directly supported the government's legal strategy in this case. His public statements and policy decisions reinforced the administration's hardline stance against Iran.
Since 2018
Recent Events
Testified: David Schenker → United States of America v. Iran (Case No. 1:18-cv-02534)
David Schenker, as Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, provided expert testimony and official statements in support of U.S. legal actions against Iran, including sanctions enforcement and terrorism-related litigation. His role involved detailing Iran's destabilizing activities in the Levant region, which were used as evidence in this and related cases.
1/1/2019