The Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act refers to legislative proposals in the United States Congress aimed at repealing federal energy efficiency standards for incandescent light bulbs, which were established under the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA). The primary version, H.R. 849, was introduced on March 1, 2011, during the 112th Congress by Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN). This bill sought to eliminate mandates requiring general service incandescent lamps, rough service lamps, and other designated lamps to meet specific efficiency standards, arguing for consumer choice and against government overreach in everyday products. It was part of a broader conservative pushback against environmental regulations during the early Obama administration, reflecting debates on energy policy, innovation, and federal authority. An earlier iteration, H.R. 5616, was introduced on March 13, 2008, in the 110th Congress, similarly targeting the phase-out of incandescent bulbs unless certain findings were made by the Comptroller General. Neither bill advanced beyond introduction, highlighting the contentious nature of lighting efficiency standards, which aimed to reduce energy consumption but faced criticism for limiting options and potentially harming manufacturers. The 2011 bill garnered support from free-market advocates and some industry groups, but it did not pass, as efficiency standards remained in place until later adjustments under subsequent administrations. These acts underscore networks of influence involving Republican lawmakers, conservative think tanks, and business interests opposed to regulatory burdens. Bachmann's sponsorship tied it to Tea Party-era deregulation efforts, with implications for energy policy and consumer rights debates that continue in discussions around climate and efficiency mandates.