Key Facts
Type
501(c)(4)
Sector
Not specified
Industry
Not specified
Status
Draft
Country
Not specified
Headquarters
Not specified
Founded
Not specified
Dissolved
Active
Also Known As
No alternate names
Tags
No tags
Overall Confidence
90%
Internal Notes
No notes
Key Information
Leadership
No leadership added
Positions
No positions added
EIN
Not specified
State of Incorporation
Not specified
Mission Statement
Not specified
Annual Revenue
Not disclosed
Political Spending
Not disclosed
Disclosure Status
Not specified
About
The Concord Fund, formerly known as the Judicial Crisis Network, is a conservative advocacy organization that has played a key role in promoting conservative judicial appointments and legal causes. It is closely tied to Leonard Leo and has received significant 'dark money' donations.
Key Relationships
Leonard Leo
funds
Leonard Leo directs funding to the Concord Fund (formerly the Judicial Crisis Network), a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization that has played a central role in advocating for conservative judicial nominations, shaping public opinion around Leo's initiatives, and supporting conservative policy advocacy and political campaigns. The Concord Fund, part of Leo's broader influence network, has received millions in donations, including anonymous donations and contributions from Leo-affiliated entities such as the Marble Freedom Trust, which Leo has helped allocate to advance his conservative agenda. Leaked documents reveal that Leo has used the Concord Fund as a front organization to channel 'dark money' from billionaire donors into conservative legal and judicial initiatives, specifically directing these funds to support campaigns for conservative judicial appointments, including those of Supreme Court justices. The organization's rebranding from the Judicial Crisis Network was intended to obscure its ties to Leo's network.
Since 2014
Leonard Leo
rebranded_as
The Concord Fund was rebranded from the Judicial Crisis Network in 2020, a group closely associated with Leonard Leo. Leonard Leo played a key role in this rebranding, which was part of a broader strategy to distance the organization from its controversial past and obscure its ties to Leo's network while continuing its mission of influencing judicial appointments, funding conservative judicial and policy campaigns, and advocating for conservative policy.
Since 2020